AWS Neptune vs Azure Cosmos DB Which graph database service is better

May 24, 2021

AWS Neptune vs Azure Cosmos DB: Which Graph Database Service is Better?

Are you looking for a robust graph database service? Do you need a reliable and scalable solution for your cloud-based application? If yes, then you may have come across two of the most popular graph database services - AWS Neptune and Azure Cosmos DB.

But how do you choose the best option for your business? In this article, we will compare both solutions to help you make an informed decision.

What are AWS Neptune and Azure Cosmos DB?

AWS Neptune and Azure Cosmos DB are fully-managed graph database services provided by Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure, respectively. They are designed to support highly connected data and real-time applications that require complex queries and analysis.

Both are highly scalable and don't require any infrastructure management. They are perfect for businesses that want to focus on developing their applications instead of managing their databases.

Features Comparison

Here are the main features of each service:

AWS Neptune

  • Fully-managed graph database service
  • Supports both Property Graph Model and RDF Graph Model
  • Highly scalable with up to 15 read replicas
  • Offers Multi-AZ deployment for high availability
  • Provides access to the Neptune Query Language (NQL)
  • Integrates well with other AWS services

Azure Cosmos DB

  • Fully-managed graph database service
  • Offers support for various APIs, including Gremlin API, SQL API, MongoDB API, Azure Table API, and Cassandra API
  • Highly scalable with up to 99.99% availability
  • Global distribution for minimal latency
  • Provides access to the Graph API for highly connected data
  • Integrates well with other Azure services

Performance Comparison

Both services offer high-performance, scalable, and highly available solutions. However, there are some differences that can affect your choice.

Here are the performance metrics:

AWS Neptune

  • 16ms latency for read requests
  • 33ms latency for write requests
  • 1,500 requests per second (RPS) for read requests
  • 1,000 RPS for write requests

Azure Cosmos DB

  • 10ms latency for read requests
  • 10ms latency for write requests
  • 10,000 RPS for read requests
  • 2,500 RPS for write requests

Pricing Comparison

Pricing is always an important factor when choosing any service. While both AWS Neptune and Azure Cosmos DB are scalable and offer tier-based pricing, the exact cost depends on your usage requirements.

AWS Neptune

  • Hourly rate starting from $0.10
  • Additional charges for storage and data transfer

Azure Cosmos DB

  • Hourly rate starting from $0.03
  • Additional charges for storage, data transfer, and requests

Conclusion

Both AWS Neptune and Azure Cosmos DB are highly reliable, scalable, and performance-oriented graph database services. However, the key decision factor depends on each business's unique requirements.

AWS Neptune provides native support for both Property Graph Model and RDF Graph Model and integrates well with other AWS services. Comparatively, Azure Cosmos DB offers multiple APIs, including the Graph API, and provides global distribution for minimal latency.

Lastly, pricing depends on specific use cases, so it's crucial to analyze each one to find the most suitable option.

We hope this comparison guide helps you find the best graph database service for your business. Happy graphing!

References


© 2023 Flare Compare